| PDF Pages<\/th>\n | PDF Title<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2<\/td>\n | undefined <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 8<\/td>\n | Foreword <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 9<\/td>\n | Introduction <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 11<\/td>\n | 1 Scope 2 Normative references 3 Terms and definitions 4 Design engagement process for the Giant Mine remediation project, Yellowknife Northwest Territories, Canada 4.1 Aspect of managing mining legacies 4.2 Recognition of a problem that needed to be resolved <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 12<\/td>\n | 4.3 Steps involved and expertise\/stakeholders involved 4.4 Evaluation of performance of this initiative 4.5 Key learnings for others 5 Mining legacy program performance evaluation and reporting \u2014 British Columbia (BC) Canada 5.1 General <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 13<\/td>\n | 5.2 Recognition of a problem that needed to be resolved 5.3 Steps involved and expertise\/stakeholders involved 5.4 Evaluation of performance of this initiative 5.5 Key learnings for others 6 Remediation of the abandoned mines in the South Alligator uranium field, Northern Territory, Australia 6.1 Aspect of managing mining legacies <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 14<\/td>\n | 6.2 Background 6.3 Recognition of a problem that needed to be resolved 6.4 Steps involved and expertise\/stakeholders involved 6.5 Evaluation of performance of this initiative 6.6 Key learnings for others <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 15<\/td>\n | 7 Valuing traditional knowledge within the Rum Jungle rehabilitation project, Northern Territory, Australia 7.1 Aspect of managing mining legacies 7.2 Recognition of a problem that needed to be resolved 7.3 Steps involved and expertise\/stakeholders involved 7.4 Evaluation of performance of this initiative <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 16<\/td>\n | 7.5 Key learnings for others 8 Difficulties encountered during the closure of mines prompted improvements to legal instruments, Mali 8.1 Context of case study 8.2 The Kalana Mine 8.3 The Syama Mine <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 17<\/td>\n | 8.4 The Morila Mine 8.5 Key learnings from these examples for others 9 Government strategy for rehabilitation of abandoned asbestos mines in South Africa 9.1 Context of case study <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 18<\/td>\n | 9.2 National strategy for derelict and ownerless mines 9.3 Progress and challenges implementing national strategy 9.3.1 Legislative challenges 9.3.2 Process challenges 9.3.3 Technical challenges 10 Managing biodiversity offsets and mining legacy rehabilitation and care, South Africa 10.1 Recognition of a problem that needed to be resolved <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 19<\/td>\n | 10.1.1 Opportunity for biodiversity offsets 10.2 Existing tools and concepts for biodiversity offsets for mining legacies <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 20<\/td>\n | 10.3 Application of tools and concepts as funding mechanisms 10.4 Application challenges <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 21<\/td>\n | 10.5 Industry and society benefits 11 Potential limitations of mechanisms used to fund mining legacy programs, Western Australia, Australia 11.1 Aspect of managing mining legacies 11.2 Background 11.3 Unanticipated low interest rates 11.4 Key learnings for others <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 22<\/td>\n | 12 Long term financing of the perpetual obligations resulting from hard coal mining in Germany 12.1 Historic context 12.2 Origin of RAG-Stiftung (RAG Foundation) 12.3 The tasks of RAG-Foundation 12.4 Financing perpetual mine management obligations <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 23<\/td>\n | 12.5 Building up the foundation\u2019s assets 12.6 Supporting education, science and culture 12.7 The foundation\u2019s model for the future 12.8 Extract of statutes of relevance to RAG 13 Organising post-mining in France 13.1 Background <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 24<\/td>\n | Figure 1 \u2014 Key players in mining risk management (DREAL: Regional Directorates of Environment, territory Development and Housing; DDT: Departmental Directorates of Territories) 13.2 Introduction to post-mining legal arrangements 13.3 The French Mining Code 13.4 Progression toward mine closure and lease relinquishment <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 25<\/td>\n | 13.5 Mining risk prevention plans 13.6 Post mining management by the state <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 26<\/td>\n | 13.7 Conclusion 14 National review of abandoned mine land (AML) programs, United States of America 14.1 General 14.2 Review of hardrock AML programs <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 27<\/td>\n | 14.3 Partnerships 14.4 Cost challenges 15 Funding and resourcing legacy nickel mine rehabilitation, New Caledonia 15.1 General 15.2 Establishment of the Nickel Fund to rehabilitate legacy mines 15.3 Estimating the needs of the Nickel Fund <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 28<\/td>\n | 15.4 Management of the Nickel Fund 15.5 Illustrating key challenges with reference to the Thio Valley area 15.6 How the Thio valley community were engaged 15.7 Benefits from the program in the Thio valley 15.8 Progress so far in the Thio valley <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 29<\/td>\n | 15.9 Evaluating performance 15.10 Maintenance of rehabilitated sites 16 Reopening the Otanm\u00e4ki Mine, Finland 16.1 Aspect of managing mining legacies and source 16.2 Recognition of a problem that needed to be resolved <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 30<\/td>\n | 16.3 Steps involved and expertise\/stakeholders involved 16.4 Evaluation of performance of this initiative 16.5 Key learnings for others 17 Online monitoring and early alert system for tailings storage facilities (TSF), Chile 17.1 Background <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 31<\/td>\n | 17.2 Transparent tailings initiative 17.3 Purpose of initiative <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 32<\/td>\n | 17.4 System design <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 33<\/td>\n | 18 Public private partnership funding mode of legacy Green Golden Lake coal mining rehabilitation program, China 18.1 Introduction of China managing mine legacy 18.2 Green Golden Lake coal mining rehabilitation program 18.2.1 Background 18.2.2 Recognition of a financial problem that needed to be resolved <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 34<\/td>\n | 18.2.3 Evaluation of performance of this initiative 18.2.4 Key learning for others 19 Structured case studies <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 35<\/td>\n | Table 1 \u2014 Montjean sur Loire mines, France <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 37<\/td>\n | Table 2 \u2014 South Alligator Valley uranium mines, Australia <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 39<\/td>\n | Table 3 \u2014 Tybo tailings, USA <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 41<\/td>\n | Table 4 \u2014 Remediation Klaraschacht, Germany <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 43<\/td>\n | Table 5 \u2014 Remediation of the near-surface mining area at \u2018Braut in K\u00fcpperswiese, Germany <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 45<\/td>\n | Table 6 \u2014 Multiple mining legacies near Pontgibaud \u2013 Auvergne, France <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 47<\/td>\n | Bibliography <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Mine closure and reclamation. Managing mining legacies – Case studies and bibliography<\/b><\/p>\n |