{"id":358830,"date":"2024-10-20T01:23:12","date_gmt":"2024-10-20T01:23:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/uncategorized\/bs-11342010\/"},"modified":"2024-10-26T02:00:59","modified_gmt":"2024-10-26T02:00:59","slug":"bs-11342010","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/publishers\/bsi\/bs-11342010\/","title":{"rendered":"BS 1134:2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
This British Standard gives guidance on the measurement of surface texture using a stylus instrument. This standard describes the way in which measurements can be taken and how to interpret the results. The guide also gives recommendations for the use of comparison specimens.<\/p>\n
PDF Pages<\/th>\n | PDF Title<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
8<\/td>\n | \tFigure 1\tCo\u2011ordinate system \tFigure\u00a02\tThe effect of measuring in different directions to the surface lay <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
9<\/td>\n | \tFigure\u00a03\tTwo surfaces with the same Ra value but different functional\u00a0characteristics <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
12<\/td>\n | Figure 4\u2003Separation of surface texture into roughness, waviness and profile <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
15<\/td>\n | Figure 5\u2003Profile elements \tFigure 6\tLocal slope <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
16<\/td>\n | Figure 7\u2003Maximum profile peak height, example of roughness profile <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
17<\/td>\n | Figure 8\u2003Maximum profile valley depth, example of roughness profile <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
18<\/td>\n | Figure 9\u2003Derivation of the arithmetical mean deviation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
19<\/td>\n | \tFigure 10\tDetermination of Ra and Rq <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
20<\/td>\n | Figure 11\u2003The difference between positive and negative skewness <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
21<\/td>\n | Figure 12\u2003Width of profile elements <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
23<\/td>\n | Figure 13\u2003Material ratio curve <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
24<\/td>\n | Figure 14\u2003Profile section level separation Figure 15\u2003Profile height amplitude distribution curve <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
25<\/td>\n | Figure 16\u2003Amplitude distribution curve <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
26<\/td>\n | Table 1\u2003Surface roughness values produced by common production processes and materials <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
27<\/td>\n | \tFigure\u00a017\tElements of the typical stylus instrument <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
29<\/td>\n | Table\u00a02\u2003\ufffdRelationship between the roughness cut\u2011off wavelength lc, tip radius and maximum sampling\u00a0spacing <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
30<\/td>\n | \tFigure\u00a018\tThe effects of using a stylus with a spherical tip <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
31<\/td>\n | \tFigure\u00a019\tExample of a stylus tip measuring a re-entrant feature <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
32<\/td>\n | Table 3\u2003\ufffdChoice of cut\u2011off wavelength for a number of common machining operations \nDimensions in millimetres <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
38<\/td>\n | Table\u00a04\u2003Estimates for choosing roughness sampling lengths for the measurement of non-periodic profiles Table\u00a05\u2003Estimates for choosing roughness sampling lengths for the measurement of non-periodic profiles <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
39<\/td>\n | Table\u00a06\u2003Estimates for choosing roughness sampling lengths for the measurement of periodic tables Table 7\u2003Types, names and uses of material measures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
40<\/td>\n | \tFigure 20\tType A1\u00a0material measure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
41<\/td>\n | Figure\u00a021\u2003Procedure for the assessment of Type A1\u00a0measures \tFigure\u00a022\tType A2\u00a0material measure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
42<\/td>\n | \tFigure\u00a023\tType B2\u00a0material measure \tFigure\u00a024\tType B2\u00a0material measure Figure 25\u2003Type B3 material measure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
43<\/td>\n | \tFigure\u00a026\tType C1\u00a0material measure \tFigure\u00a027\tType C2\u00a0material measure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
44<\/td>\n | Figure\u00a028\u2003Type C3\u00a0material measure \tFigure\u00a029\tType C4\u00a0calibration artefact \tFigure\u00a030\tType D1 material measure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
45<\/td>\n | \tFigure\u00a031\tType D2\u00a0material measure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
46<\/td>\n | \tFigure\u00a032\tType E2\u00a0material measure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
52<\/td>\n | \tTable\u00a08\tChange of the total uncertainty in a height measurement \tTable\u00a09\tStated uncertainties for measurements made with ACMESURF <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
53<\/td>\n | Table\u00a0A.1\u2003Old and new surface texture parameters, ISO\u00a04287:1997 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Assessment of surface texture. Guidance and general information<\/b><\/p>\n |