IEEE 60980-344-2020
$57.96
IEEE/IEC International Standard – Nuclear facilities – Equipment important to safety – Seismic qualification
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
IEEE | 2020 |
Revision Standard – Active.
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
1 | IEC/IEEE 60980-344-2020 Front Cover |
3 | Title page |
4 | CONTENTS |
8 | FOREWORD |
10 | INTRODUCTION |
13 | 1 Scope 2 Normative references 3 Terms and definitions |
21 | 4 Abbreviated terms |
22 | 5 General discussion of earthquake environment and equipment response 5.1 General 5.2 Earthquake environment 5.3 Equipment on foundations 5.4 Equipment on structures |
23 | 5.5 Interfaces and adverse interactions 5.6 Simulating vibration induced by an earthquake 5.6.1 General 5.6.2 Response spectrum |
24 | 5.6.3 Time history 5.6.4 PSD function 5.7 Damping 5.7.1 General |
25 | 5.7.2 Measurement of damping 5.8 Application of damping 5.8.1 General 5.8.2 Application of damping in testing |
26 | 5.8.3 Application of damping in analysis 6 Seismic qualification requirements 6.1 General |
27 | 6.2 Specification of equipment to be qualified 6.3 Specification of ageing condition 6.4 Specification of seismic requirements 6.5 Specification of acceptance criteria |
28 | 7 Seismic qualification approach 7.1 Safety function 7.2 Seismic qualification methods |
29 | 8 Ageing 8.1 General |
30 | 8.2 Thermal ageing 8.3 Radiation ageing 8.4 Material degradation and corrosion 8.5 Mechanical or electrical cycle ageing 8.6 Vibration ageing 8.6.1 General |
31 | 8.6.2 Ageing from non-seismic vibration conditions 8.6.3 Hydrodynamic loads 8.6.4 Seismic ageing (OBE/S1) 9 Testing 9.1 General 9.1.1 Test programme |
33 | 9.1.2 Mounting 9.1.3 Monitoring 9.1.4 Loading |
34 | 9.1.5 Refurbishment 9.1.6 Exploratory tests |
36 | 9.1.7 Seismic ageing (OBE/S1) 9.2 Proof and generic testing |
37 | 9.3 Fragility testing 9.4 Component testing 9.5 Assembly testing 9.5.1 General |
38 | 9.6 Test methods 9.6.1 General |
39 | 9.6.2 Single-frequency test |
41 | Figures Figure 1 – Sine beat Figure 2 – Decaying sine |
42 | 9.6.3 Multiple-frequency tests |
45 | Figure 3 – Random spectrum with superimposed sine beats |
46 | Figure 4 – Resonant amplification versus cycles per beat |
47 | 9.6.4 Other tests 9.6.5 Test duration and low-cycle fatigue potential 9.6.6 Multi-axis tests |
49 | 9.6.7 Line-mounted equipment |
50 | 9.6.8 Additional tests 9.7 Test documentation 10 Qualification by similarity 10.1 General 10.2 Excitation 10.3 Physical systems |
51 | 10.4 Safety function 11 Analysis 11.1 General |
52 | 11.2 Seismic analysis methods 11.2.1 General |
53 | 11.2.2 Static analysis 11.2.3 Static coefficient analysis 11.2.4 Dynamic analysis |
54 | 11.3 Nonlinear equipment response 11.4 Other dynamic loads 11.5 Seismic analysis results |
55 | 11.6 Documentation of analysis 12 Combined analysis and testing 12.1 General 12.2 Modal testing 12.2.1 General 12.2.2 Normal-mode method |
56 | 12.2.3 Transfer-function method 12.2.4 Analytical methods utilizing test data 12.2.5 Qualification 12.3 Extrapolation for similar equipment 12.3.1 General 12.3.2 Test method |
57 | 12.3.3 Analysis 12.4 Shock testing 12.5 Extrapolation for multi-cabinet assemblies 12.6 Other test/analysis |
58 | 13 Documentation 13.1 General 13.2 Seismic qualification report 13.2.1 General 13.2.2 Analysis 13.2.3 Testing |
59 | 13.2.4 Combined analysis and testing or similarity |
60 | Annex A (normative) Experience-based seismic qualification A.1 General A.2 Earthquake experience data A.2.1 General A.2.2 Characterization of the earthquake experience motions |
61 | A.2.3 Earthquake experience spectrum (EES) A.2.4 Characterization of reference equipment class |
62 | Table A.1 – EES reduction factor based on number of independent items |
63 | A.2.5 Qualification of candidate equipment |
64 | A.3 Test experience data A.3.1 General A.3.2 Characterization of test experience input motions A.3.3 Test experience spectra (TES) |
65 | A.3.4 Characterization of reference equipment class |
66 | A.3.5 Qualification of candidate equipment A.4 Special considerations A.4.1 Inherently rugged equipment |
67 | A.4.2 Limitations A.5 Experience-based documentation A.5.1 General |
68 | A.5.2 Reference data A.5.3 Candidate equipment qualification |
69 | Annex B (informative) Measurement of zero period acceleration |
70 | Annex C (informative) Frequency content and stationarity |
71 | Annex D (informative) Fragility testing D.1 General D.2 Excitation motion |
72 | D.3 Application of results D.4 Other considerations |
74 | Annex E (informative) Test duration and number of cycles |
75 | Figure E.1 – Fractional cycles to obtain one equipment maximum peak cycle |
76 | Figure E.2 – Equivalent peak-stress cycles induced by stationary random motion Figure E.3 – Equivalent peak-stress cycles inducedby stationary random motion to 20 Hz |
78 | Annex F (informative) Statistically independent motions |
79 | Annex G (informative) Seismic qualification illustrative flowcharts G.1 General G.2 Establishment of seismic conditions and acceptance criteria G.3 Qualification by testing G.4 Qualification by analysis G.5 Qualification by combination of analysis and testing |
80 | Figure G.1 – Seismic qualification flowchart |
81 | Figure G.2 – Seismic qualification test flowchart |
82 | Figure G.3 – Seismic qualification analysis flowchart |
83 | Figure G.4 – Seismic qualification analysis and test flowchart |
84 | Bibliography |