BS EN IEC 61757-3-2:2022
$198.66
Fibre optic sensors – Acoustic sensing and vibration measurement. Distributed sensing
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
BSI | 2022 | 56 |
This part of IEC 61757 specifies terminology, characteristic performance parameters, related test and calculation methods, and specific test equipment for interrogation units used in distributed fibre optic acoustic sensing and vibration measurement systems. This document refers to Rayleigh backscatter and phase detection method by phase-sensitive coherent optical time-domain reflectometry (ϕ-OTDR) only. Quasi-static and low frequency operation modes are not covered by this document. Generic specifications for fibre optic sensors are defined in IEC 61757.
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
2 | undefined |
5 | Annex ZA (normative)Normative references to international publicationswith their corresponding European publications |
6 | Blank Page |
7 | English CONTENTS |
10 | FOREWORD |
12 | INTRODUCTION |
13 | 1 Scope 2 Normative references 3 Terms, definitions, abbreviated terms and symbols 3.1 Terms and definitions |
14 | Figures Figure 1 – Distributed acoustic sensing system |
16 | 3.2 Abbreviated terms |
17 | 3.3 Symbols Figure 2 – Signal parameters relating to time series and their spatial point identification |
18 | 4 Performance parameters of a distributed acoustic sensing system 5 Test apparatus for performance parameter determination 5.1 Simulated fibre sensor (SFS) |
19 | 5.2 Fibre stretcher Figure 3 – Simulated fibre sensor Figure 4 – Configuration for SFS showing the locations TP1, TP2, and TP3 |
20 | 5.3 Signal generation and amplification instrumentation 5.4 Optical attenuator 5.5 Isolation chamber |
21 | 6 Test procedures of performance parameters 6.1 General 6.2 Dynamic range 6.2.1 General 6.2.2 Set-up 6.2.3 Stimulus Figure 5 – Test set-up for dynamic range test |
22 | 6.2.4 Data collection and processing |
23 | Figure 6 – Example of a strain stimulus signal andrecovered phase of IU response with a limit at 17 s |
24 | 6.2.5 Data reporting 6.3 Frequency response 6.3.1 General 6.3.2 Set-up Figure 7 – Example of a zoom view of strain stimulus signal andrecovered phase of IU response showing a phase jump at 16,98 s |
25 | 6.3.3 Stimulus 6.3.4 Data collection and processing Figure 8 – Test set-up for frequency response test |
26 | 6.3.5 Data reporting Figure 9 – Magnitude response showing the 40 stimulus signals all with magnitude |
27 | Figure 10 – Interrogation unit response to test stimulus,scaled in strain units, shown in the frequency domain |
28 | 6.4 Fidelity 6.4.1 General 6.4.2 Set-up 6.4.3 Stimulus Figure 11 – Interrogation unit normalized frequency response Figure 12 – Test set-up for fidelity test |
29 | 6.4.4 Data collection and processing 6.4.5 Data reporting 6.5 Self-noise 6.5.1 General 6.5.2 Set-up |
30 | 6.5.3 Stimulus 6.5.4 Data collection and processing Figure 13 – Test set-up for self-noise |
31 | Figure 14 – 2D data field representing the time varyingacoustic field as a function of distance |
32 | Figure 15 – System noise floor data processing schematic |
33 | 6.5.5 Data reporting 6.6 Spatial resolution 6.6.1 General Figure 16 – Example plot of self-noise data |
34 | 6.6.2 Set-up 6.6.3 Stimulus 6.6.4 Data collection and processing Figure 17 – Test set-up for spatial resolution test |
35 | 6.6.5 Data reporting Figure 18 – Spatial sample points to be used for spatial resolution evaluation |
36 | Figure 19 – Graphical plotting approach used to determine spatial resolution |
37 | 6.7 Crosstalk 6.7.1 General 6.7.2 Set-up 6.7.3 Stimulus 6.7.4 Data collection and processing Figure 20 – Test set-up for crosstalk measurement |
38 | 6.7.5 Data reporting 6.8 Loss budget 6.8.1 General Figure 21 – Highlighted points to be sampled for crosstalk test Figure 22 – Example plot for crosstalk test results |
39 | 6.8.2 Set-up 6.8.3 Stimulus 6.8.4 Data collection and processing 6.8.5 Data reporting Figure 23 – Test set-up for loss budget test |
40 | 6.9 Sensor reflection robustness 6.9.1 General 6.9.2 Set-up |
41 | Figure 24 – Test configurations for sensor reflection robustness |
42 | 6.9.3 Stimulus Figure 25 – Fabrication examples for creating partial reflections |
43 | 6.9.4 Data collection, processing, and reporting |
44 | Annex A (informative)Conversion of optical phase measurement to strain |
46 | Table A.1 – Optical phase and strain relationships |
47 | Annex B (normative)Requirements for low uncertainty measurement B.1 Single tone stimulus testing Figure B.1 – Fibre stretcher spatial sample points |
48 | B.2 Frequency response testing Figure B.2 – Frequency domain plot of single tone stimulus |
49 | Figure B.3 – Frequency response plot of single tone stimulus |
50 | Annex C (informative)FFT window functions C.1 Flat-top window used for frequency domain measurements of spectral peaks Figure C.1 – Flat-top window and its Fourier transform characteristics |
51 | C.2 Window functions used for frequency domain noise measurements Figure C.2 – Blackman-Harris window and its Fourier transform characteristics |
52 | Figure C.3 – Hamming window and its Fourier transform characteristics |
54 | Bibliography |