ASTM-D1990:2007 Edition
$58.50
D1990-07 Standard Practice for Establishing Allowable Properties for Visually-Graded Dimension Lumber from In-Grade Tests of Full-Size Specimens
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
ASTM | 2007 | 29 |
1.1 Due to the number of specimens involved and the number of mechanical properties to be evaluated, a methodology for evaluating the data and assigning allowable properties to both tested and untested grade/size cells is necessary. Sampling and analysis of tested cells are covered in Practice D 2915. The mechanical test methods are covered in Test Methods D 198 and D 4761. This practice covers the necessary procedures for assigning allowable stress and modulus of elasticity values to dimension lumber from In-Grade tests. The practice includes methods to permit assignment of allowable stress and modulus of elasticity values to untested sizes and grades, as well as some untested properties.
1.2 A basic assumption of the procedures used in this practice is that the samples selected and tested are representative of the entire global population being evaluated. This approach is consistent with the historical clear wood methodology of assigning an allowable property to visually-graded lumber which was representative of the entire growth range of a species or species group. Every effort shall be made to ensure the test sample is representative of population by grade and size (see 7.1.1 and 7.1.2).
1.3 This practice covers the principles and procedures for establishing allowable stress values for bending, tension parallel to grain, compression parallel to grain and modulus of elasticity values for structural design from ‘In-Grade’ tests of full-size visually graded solid sawn dimension lumber. This practice is focused on, but is not limited to, grades which used the concepts incorporated in Practice D 245 and were developed and interpreted under American Softwood Lumber PS 20-70.
Note 1 – In the implementation of the North American In-Grade test program, allowable stress values for compression perpendicular to grain and shear parallel to grain for structural design were calculated using the procedures of Practice D 245.
1.4 This practice only covers dimension lumber.
1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
1 | Scope Referenced Documents |
2 | Terminology Significance and Use |
3 | Documentation of Results, Adjustments, and Development of Allowable Properties Development of Stress Grades Minimum Sampling Matrix |
4 | Input Test Data and Adjustments to Input Test Data |
5 | Establishment of Characteristic Values |
6 | Adjustments to Characteristic Values |
7 | Establishing Grade Relationships for Stress and Modulus of Elasticity Establishing Allowable Properties TABLE 1 |
8 | Reassessment and Affirmation A1. MOISTURE ADJUSTMENT PROCEDURE FOR DEVELOPMENT OF CHARACTERISTIC VALUES FOR MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF LUMBER A1.1 A1.2 TABLE 2 TABLE 3 TABLE A1.1 TABLE A1.2 |
9 | A1.3 A1.4 X1. DIMENSIONAL CHANGES IN LUMBER WITH MOISTURE CONTENT X1.1 X1.2 X1.3 |
10 | X2. DEVELOPMENT OF AND RECOMMENDED LIMITS TO VOLUME ADJUSTMENT EQUATION X2.1 Development of Volume Adjustment Equation X2.2 Length and Width Adjustment Factors X2.3 Limits |
11 | X3. EXAMPLE OF ALLOWABLE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT X3.1 Scope X3.2 Matrix Definition and Data Collection X3.3 Reporting of Test Data X3.4 Adjustments to Input Data X3.5 Development of Characteristic Values |
12 | FIG. X3.1 |
13 | FIG. X3.2 |
14 | TABLE X3.1 |
15 | TABLE X3.2 TABLE X3.3 |
16 | TABLE X3.4 TABLE X3.5 |
17 | TABLE X3.6 TABLE X3.7 TABLE X3.8 TABLE X3.9 |
18 | TABLE X3.10 TABLE X3.11 TABLE X3.12 TABLE X3.13 |
19 | X4. DISCUSSION AND DERIVATION OF FORMULAS USED TO ESTIMATE UNTESTED PROPERTIES IN TABLE X3.14 FIG. X4.1 |
20 | X5. NONPARAMETRIC ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (Ref X5.1 X5.2 X6. TUKEY MULTIPLE COMPARISON X6.1 X6.2 X6.3 FIG. X4.2 |
21 | X7. CHI-SQUARE TEST X7.1 X7.2 X7.3 TABLE X6.1 |
22 | TABLE X7.1 |
23 | X8. EXAMPLE OF GRADE MODEL APPLICATION X8.1 Establishing the Grade Model X8.2 Application of the Grade Model |
24 | FIG. X8.1 FIG. X8.2 |
25 | X9. DISCUSSION OF GROUPING BY OTHER APPROPRIATE TECHNICAL CRITERIA X9.1 X10. COMPARISON OF LUMBER DESIGN CAPACITIES AT VARIOUS MOISTURE CONTENTS X10.1 |
26 | X11. GUIDELINES FOR REASSESSMENT OF LUMBER PROPERTY VALUES DERIVED ACCORDING TO D1990 X11.1 Scope X11.2 Define Objectives X11.3 Sampling Procedures and Sample Size X11.4 Test Methods X11.5 Analysis TABLE X10.1 |
27 | X11.6 Decision Sequence for Implementation X12. GRADE QUALITY INDEX X12.1 Origin of Grade Quality Index X12.2 Background on Strength Ratio Calculations X12.3 Grade Quality Index Calculations |
28 | X12.4 Acceptability Considerations of the GQI X12.5 Evolution of the GQI |
29 | X12.6 Further Notes on Grade Quality Measurement and Calulations REFERENCES |