ASCE 9780784410578 2010
$44.42
TMDLs in the Urban Environment
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
ASCE | 2010 | 201 |
This report contains a variety of case studies on urban TMDLs that demonstrate acceptable modeling, acceptable pollutant allocations, and in some cases, acceptable implementation plans.
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
6 | Contents |
8 | Introduction |
15 | Fecal Coliform TMDL (Total Maximum Daily Load) Development for Four Mile Run, Virginia |
18 | 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background 1.1.1 Study Area Description |
20 | 1.2 Impaired Water Quality Status 1.3 Goal and Objectives |
21 | 2. WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION 2.1 Climate 2.2 Land Use |
23 | 2.3 Water Quality Data |
24 | 2.3.1 Seasonal Analysis |
25 | 3. SOURCE ASSESSMENT 3.1 Nonpoint Sources 3.1.1 Bacteria Source Tracking (Genetic Fingerprinting) |
26 | 3.2 Point Sources |
27 | 4. MODELING APPROACH FOR FOUR MILE RUN TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD 4.1 Model Description |
28 | 4.2 Model Sub-watershed Discretization and Land Use |
29 | 4.3 Selection of Model Simulation Period 4.3.1 Availability of Precipitation Data |
30 | 4.4 Hydrology Modeling Approach 4.5 Hydrology Calibration |
31 | 4.6 Summary of Key Hydrology Model Parameters Adjusted in Calibration 4.7 Water Quality Modeling Approach – Source Representation |
34 | 4.8 Existing Scenario Conditions 4.8.1 Water Quality Parameters |
35 | 4.8.2 Results of the Water Quality Calibration |
36 | 5. LOAD ALLOCATIONS 5.1 Background |
37 | 5.2 Allocations Scenarios 5.2.1 Wasteload Allocations 5.2.2 Load Allocations |
38 | 5.3 Future Growth |
39 | 5.3.1 Consideration of Critical Conditions 5.4 TMDL Implementation |
40 | 6. REASONABLE ASSURANCE FOR IMPLEMENTATION 6.1 Follow-Up Monitoring 6.2 Regulatory Framework |
41 | 7. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION 8. REFERENCES |
45 | Total Maximum Daily Load for Nitrogen Compounds for the Los Angeles River and its Tributaries |
50 | 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Study Area Description |
53 | 1.2 Extent of Impairments |
55 | 2.0 TECHNICAL MODELING APPROACH |
56 | 2.1 Guiding Assumptions |
57 | 2.2 Model Selection |
63 | 2.3 Supplemental Monitoring |
64 | 3.0 MODEL DEVELOPMENT FOR THE LOS ANGELES RIVER |
65 | 3.1 Model Configuration and Application Conditions 3.1.1 Model Linkages |
66 | 3.1.2 Simulation Period 3.1.3 Downstream Boundary 3.1.4 Model Setup and Inputs |
86 | 3.2 Hydrodynamic Model Calibration and Validation |
87 | 3.2.1 Hydrodynamic Calibration (September 10 and 11, 2000) |
89 | 3.3 Water Quality Model Calibration and Validation |
92 | 3.3.1 Water Quality Calibration (September 10 and 11, 2001) |
98 | 3.3.2 Summary of Water Quality Calibration 4.0 DEVELOPMENT OF TMDL |
101 | 5.0 ALLOCATIONS 5.1 Wasteload Allocations |
105 | 5.2 Load Allocations 5.3 Critical Conditions and Seasonality |
106 | 5.4 Margin of Safety 5.5 Summary of TMDL |
107 | 6.0 IMPLEMENTATION 7.0 REFERENCES |
110 | Nutrient Management and Seagrass Restoration in Tampa Bay, Florida: A Voluntary Program Meeting TMDL Requirements |
113 | 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Background 1.2. Impaired Water Quality Status |
114 | 1.3. Resource Goals and Water Quality Targets |
115 | 2. WATERBODY CHARACTERISTICS 2.1. Water Use Classification |
116 | 3. POLLUTANT OF CONCERN |
117 | 3.1. Sources |
119 | 4. ANALYTICAL AND MODELING APPROACHES 4.1. Technical Basis for the Goal-setting Process |
121 | 4.2. Procedures to Determine the Need for Additional Corrective Actions |
129 | 5. IMPLEMENTATION 5.1. Participating Entities |
130 | 5.2. Management Activities |
131 | 5.3. Future Growth 6. MONITORING AND REPORTING RESULTS 6.1. Water Quality Monitoring Programs 6.2. Implementing Management Activities |
132 | 6.3. Evaluating Progress toward Goals 6.4. Proposed Corrective Actions 7. PROGRESS 7.1. Tampa Bay Nitrogen Management Consortium Action Plan: 1995-2000 |
134 | 7.2. Chlorophyll a Targets 7.3. Seagrass Goals |
136 | 8. REFERENCES |
139 | Nutrient and Siltation TMDL Development for Wissahickon Creek, Pennsylvania |
143 | 1.0 INTRODUCTION |
145 | 2.0 WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION |
146 | 2.1 Hydrology |
149 | 2.2 Water Quality |
156 | 3.0 SOURCE ASSESSMENT 3.1 Nutrient Sources |
160 | 3.2 Siltation Sources |
162 | 4.0 MODELING APPROACH 4.1 Nutrient Modeling Approach |
176 | 4.2 Siltation Modeling Approach |
185 | 5.0 TMDL DEVELOPMENT 5.1 Nutrient TMDL |
187 | 5.2 Siltation TMDL |
189 | 6.0 IMPLEMENTATION 6.1 Nutrient TMDL Implementation |
193 | 6.2 Siltation TMDL Implementation |
195 | 7.0 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION |
196 | 8.0 REFERENCES |
198 | Index B C E F G H I L |
199 | M N P |
200 | S T W |